Legal Due Diligence Before a Transaction
A transaction may appear straightforward on paper while carrying legal issues that are not immediately visible from the principal agreement. Legal due diligence is the process of examining the legal position surrounding a proposed transaction before the parties become committed to it.
The purpose is not simply to identify problems. It is to understand the legal position sufficiently to decide what can proceed as proposed, what needs to be addressed, and what risks should be accepted, mitigated or reflected in the transaction documents.
What is legal due diligence?
There is no single statutory checklist that applies to every transaction. The scope of due diligence depends upon what is being acquired or transferred, who the parties are, the structure of the transaction, the industry involved and the legal risks particular to the subject matter.
A transaction involving the acquisition of shares in a company may require examination of the company’s incorporation and governance records, ownership and capital structure, material contracts, litigation, regulatory compliance, employment arrangements, intellectual property and indebtedness.
A transaction involving immovable property may require a different review, including the chain of title, registered documents, encumbrances, permissions, land-use restrictions, possession and pending disputes.
An acquisition of a business or undertaking may require both forms of examination, together with a review of the contracts, employees, licences, assets and liabilities that are intended to move with the business.
The starting point is therefore not “What documents should we ask for?” It is “What legal rights, assets, obligations and risks are relevant to this transaction?”
Begin with the transaction itself
Before reviewing documents, it is useful to understand precisely what the parties propose to do. The legal questions can differ considerably between different types of transactions.
| Share acquisition | Acquiring an interest in the company itself, together with its legal and commercial position. |
|---|---|
| Asset acquisition | Transferring identified assets and liabilities, leaving other matters with the seller. |
| Business transfer | Moving a business or undertaking, which may include contracts, employees, licences and other rights. |
| Merger or restructuring | Combining or reorganising businesses, often with specific statutory and regulatory requirements. |
| Joint venture | Creating a new business arrangement with shared control and defined rights and obligations. |
| Investment | Acquiring a minority or strategic interest, usually with specific governance and exit considerations. |
| Property acquisition | Purchasing immovable property, with a focus on title, encumbrances, permissions and possession. |
| Other arrangements | Including long-term commercial contracts or any other transaction involving the transfer or creation of legal rights. |
The transaction structure determines what is actually changing hands and which liabilities remain with the existing owner. This distinction affects the scope of the review and the protections that may need to be built into the transaction documents.
A useful preliminary exercise is therefore to identify:
- What is being acquired or transferred?
- Who currently owns or controls it?
- What rights accompany it?
- What liabilities or obligations may remain attached to it?
- What approvals or consents are required?
- What could prevent the transaction from being completed or the intended rights from being enjoyed afterwards?
Corporate and ownership position
Where a company or other business entity is involved, the first questions concern its legal identity and the authority to undertake the transaction. The review may include:
- constitutional and incorporation documents;
- current ownership and shareholding;
- authorised and issued share capital;
- shareholder and partnership arrangements;
- board and shareholder resolutions;
- changes in ownership or control;
- statutory filings and corporate records;
- existing charges and security interests;
- related-party arrangements; and
- the authority of the relevant persons to enter into the proposed transaction.
The Companies Act, 2013 contains specific requirements regarding the registration of charges created by companies over their property or assets. Section 77 requires a company creating a charge to register prescribed particulars with the Registrar within the statutory framework. A registered charge can therefore be an important part of the legal review when assets or businesses are being acquired.
The objective is not merely to confirm that the entity exists, but to determine whether the person proposing to sell, transfer, invest in or otherwise deal with the relevant interest has the authority and legal ability to do so.
Assets, title and encumbrances
Where the transaction involves assets, ownership should be distinguished from possession or registration. This is particularly important for immovable property.
Indian property registration operates within a system in which registration of a document does not, by itself, amount to conclusive proof of title. The Supreme Court has recently reiterated that registration creates a public record with presumptive evidentiary value and that prospective purchasers therefore need to undertake title due diligence, including examination of the chain of ownership and encumbrances.
Depending on the transaction, an examination of property may include:
| Title and ownership | Chain of title, registered conveyances and other instruments. |
|---|---|
| Government records | Revenue and municipal records. |
| Encumbrances | Mortgages, charges and other security interests. |
| Possession | Actual possession and any conflicting claims. |
| Permissions and land use | Land use restrictions, development permissions and applicable approvals. |
| Third-party rights | Leases, licences or other occupancy arrangements. |
| Disputes | Pending litigation or claims relating to the property. |
| Other requirements | Acquisition or requisition proceedings and sector-specific restrictions. |
The same underlying principle applies to other assets: the question is not simply whether an asset appears on a balance sheet or is physically controlled by the seller, but what legal right exists in relation to it and whether that right can be transferred as contemplated.
Contracts and commercial relationships
A business may derive much of its value from contractual relationships rather than from physical assets. Material contracts should therefore be reviewed for provisions that could affect the transaction or the future operation of the business.
Depending on the circumstances, this may include:
- customer and supplier agreements;
- leases and licences;
- distribution and franchise arrangements;
- financing documents;
- guarantees and indemnities;
- joint venture or shareholder agreements;
- technology and service agreements;
- long-term supply or purchase commitments;
- confidentiality obligations;
- non-compete or non-solicitation provisions, where legally relevant;
- termination rights;
- change-of-control provisions;
- assignment restrictions; and
- dispute-resolution clauses.
A contract may contain a right to terminate, require consent, restrict assignment or become subject to particular consequences when ownership or control changes. These provisions can be easy to overlook if the review is limited to the principal transaction documents.
A transaction may therefore need to address whether third-party consent is required, whether a contract will continue after closing, and whether any material contractual rights or obligations will be affected by the proposed transaction.
Litigation, disputes and legal claims
Pending litigation is an obvious area of review, but legal exposure is not necessarily limited to cases already filed in court. The review may need to consider:
- pending suits and appeals;
- arbitration proceedings;
- tribunal proceedings;
- regulatory proceedings;
- legal notices;
- threatened claims;
- settlements and undertakings;
- judgments and orders;
- execution or enforcement proceedings; and
- disputes involving material contracts or assets.
The purpose is to understand what each dispute concerns, what rights or liabilities may arise from it, and whether it affects the transaction or the value of what is being acquired.
Regulatory, compliance and other considerations
Regulatory diligence depends on the business involved. A company operating in a regulated sector may require licences, registrations, approvals or continuing compliance with sector-specific legislation. Even businesses that are not heavily regulated may have obligations under laws relating to employment, taxation, environment, consumer protection, competition, data, property, foreign investment or other areas.
Questions may include:
- What licences or registrations are required?
- Are they valid and current?
- Are they transferable?
- Have required filings been made?
- Are there outstanding notices or proceedings?
- Are there restrictions on the proposed transaction?
- Does a change in ownership or control trigger approval or notification?
- Are there material compliance failures that could result in penalties or loss of the relevant permission?
From findings to transaction decisions
Not every issue identified during a review has the same significance. A practical classification may be:
| Category | Description |
|---|---|
| Issues that prevent the transaction from proceeding | Defects in ownership, inability to obtain a necessary approval or a legal restriction that cannot be addressed. |
| Issues that should be resolved before completion | Missing documents, outstanding filings, required consents or identifiable defects capable of being cured. |
| Issues that require contractual protection | Risks to be addressed through representations, warranties, indemnities or other provisions. |
| Issues that can be accepted | Risks understood and accepted by the parties, having regard to their significance and the commercial context. |
A practical due diligence checklist
Before completing a transaction, the following questions provide a useful starting point:
| Area | Key questions |
|---|---|
| The transaction | What is being acquired? What liabilities? What approvals are required? |
| Ownership and authority | Who owns it? Is the counterparty authorised? Are there restrictions? |
| Contracts | Which contracts are material? Any change-of-control or consent requirements? |
| Assets and property | Is title established? Are there encumbrances? Are permissions in place? |
| Disputes | Any litigation, arbitration, notices or threatened claims? |
| Regulation | What licences are required? Any compliance issues? |
| Intellectual property | Who owns the IP? Are rights assigned or licensed? Any infringement concerns? |
| People | Any material employment obligations or disputes? |
| Liabilities | What borrowings, guarantees or contingent liabilities exist? |
| Transaction protection | Which issues need to be resolved, protected or accepted? |
Due diligence is about knowing what you are agreeing to
Legal due diligence does not eliminate all risks. Its value lies in improving the information on which the transaction is considered. A considered due diligence process allows the parties to proceed with a clearer understanding of the legal position before the transaction becomes difficult to unwind.
A transaction is an allocation of rights, obligations and risks. Due diligence helps you decide what you are agreeing to.